Good ones: #48, #37, #22, #36, #14. Also, #63 and #51 are are useful. But what bothers me the most is that no one involved with the project has cared to take a look and comment on the PR. Contributions are just being ignored. If no one merges, or even cares to comment, on simple and useful fixes, why would someone spend any time at all contributing with something great? Just fork, create your own thing and forget about ioquake. ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Angus Sent: 03/24/14 10:32 AM To: Primary ioquake3 Discussion/Development list Subject: Re: [ioquake3] Managing pull requests
On 23/03/14 22:19, Vincent P. Ellis wrote: > There are lot's of PR's piling up on ioquake3's GitHub > page: https://github.com/ioquake/ioq3/pulls > Some of them are crap, some of them are useful and a few are pure gold. > Why isn't there a discussion on this list, or on GitHub itself, about > each PR? And why isn't anyone accepting or rejecting them? People are > trying to contribute, but end up just being ignored. I don't see anything hugely important on there. Is there something specific you want looked at? _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl. Vincent Ellis C/C++ Technician vinc...@linuxmail.org El Paso, TX
_______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
