2016-09-04 22:38 GMT+02:00 Fleshgrinder <p...@fleshgrinder.com>:

> On 9/4/2016 2:29 PM, Michał Brzuchalski wrote:
> >> Providing `mutator` | `mut` keyword as method modifier sounds liek a
> good
> >> idea,
> >> althought passing `$clone` parameter as first additional param could
> break
> >> method declaration and would be misleading.
> >>
> >> Assuming mutator method is designed to  return mutated clone of
> immutable
> >> object
> >> having `$clone` variable could be handled internally without breaking
> >> method declaration.
> >>
> >> Such variable could be unlocked while in mutator method and locked on
> >> return.
> >> I was thinking about additional check if such mutator returns `$clone`
> but
> >> not `$this`
> >> but I don't see the need of it - assuming there is no what to change in
> >> some
> >> circumstances ther would be also possible to return `$this`.
> >>
> >> The return type declaration `self` could increase readability, but
> should
> >> not be required,
> >> as some developers doesn't already use return types.
> >>
> >
> > It could look like in this gist
> > https://gist.github.com/brzuchal/e7b721e22a19cca42ec0d1f597a23baf
> >
>
> This is exactly how I meant it, yes. I actually prefer it if the
> variable just exist in the context instead of passing it as first
> argument. It's less obvious that it exists but the same could be said
> about $this.
>
> Would it be possible to have this thing just in time instead of
> automatically created in every mutator function?
>
>   public mutator function f() {
>     if (condition) {
>       $clone is created;
>       return $clone;
>     }
>     return $this;
>   }
>
> PS: I started overhauling the test cases and error messages and will
> create a PR against your branch soon. I will start with the RFC
> afterwards. Should I simply edit the RFC in the Wiki or should we manage
> this somewhere else?
>
>
You may begin with modifications on RFC eg. in a gist so we can all discuss
about it before putting on RFC, is that okay to you?


> --
> Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
>
>


-- 
regards / pozdrawiam,
--
Michał Brzuchalski
brzuchalski.com

Reply via email to