Bob Weinand wrote on 14.03.2015 00:07: >> Am 13.03.2015 um 23:03 schrieb Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com>: >> >> Maybe I was naïve, but I thought I had a better way to make both weak & >> strict camps happy, instead of just ignoring the strict camp altogether. >> While there was some opposition to it - it mostly came from the main >> proponents of the Strict camp, and, well, you :) Clearly right now it seems >> that not a lot of people bought into the coercive approach, and while I hope >> it can be turned around - I realize the chances for that happening aren't >> stellar. Given we can go to a vote on Bob's RFC tomorrow without having to >> delay the PHP 7 timeline, I don't see strong reasons not to do it, and put >> to rest any theories about what might have happened if v0.1 ever went for a >> vote. >> >> Zeev > > I won't go into vote tomorrow. > > Given that we already discussed that proposal a lot a few months ago (Andreas > v1), we can go for a discussion phase a bit shorter (like 10 days total), but > I > won't put a new RFC into vote tomorrow. Especially as it's still being heavily > discussed. > > Also, this vote is just valid in case where other votes fail - so we actually > don't *compete* with Anthonys RFC. It doesn't affect the voting period of > Anthonys RFC. We can have the vote still going on a few days after both RFCs > failed. > This RFC is only about the common part of both RFCs. > > Bob > > @Guilherme: I intend to put it into vote, yes.
I think it's time to close the scalar type hinting chapter and focus on new challanges. We have a rfc with a majority, so I would like to ask Zeev, Francois and Dmitry to withdraw their rfc and open the door for finalizing php7, many people are waiting for. For 7.1 we all know how scalar type hints work in practice and know if we should remove declare(strict...), add coercion rules or stay with the v0.5 behaviour. Regards Thomas -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
