> Am 14.03.2015 um 00:14 schrieb Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com>:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bob Weinand [mailto:bobw...@hotmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:07 AM
>> To: PHP Internals List
>> Cc: Zeev Suraski; guilhermebla...@gmail.com
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
>>
>> I won't go into vote tomorrow.
>>
>> Given that we already discussed that proposal a lot a few months ago
>> (Andreas v1), we can go for a discussion phase a bit shorter (like 10 days
>> total), but I won't put a new RFC into vote tomorrow. Especially as it's
>> still
>> being heavily discussed.
>>
>> Also, this vote is just valid in case where other votes fail - so we
>> actually
>> don't *compete* with Anthonys RFC. It doesn't affect the voting period of
>> Anthonys RFC. We can have the vote still going on a few days after both
>> RFCs failed.
>> This RFC is only about the common part of both RFCs.
>
> Bob,
>
> If you don't put it into a vote by Sunday, then by definition it can't get
> into v7.0 - unless we either have another vote to delay the timeline (big
> hassle). Plus, as you can see, there are people (heck, even me) that would
> vote in favor of the Dual Mode RFC just because there's no alternative.
>
> Zeev
Zeev,
If I put it into vote until Sunday, we're breaking the voting process. Which
required an apt discussion phase which definitely isn't given when we start
Sunday.
Also. Your timeline RFC leaves a bit room for interpretation ("Line up" means?
Put into discussion? Vote? Have votes all already accepted?) . If necessary,
I'll rather push timeline a bit than breaking vote process.
Thanks,
Bob
