On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: >> > >> > On 8 Jul 2014, at 15:48, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: >> > >> >> I've just voted "no" for this, because it introduces a tiny BC break. >> >> Now, I realize this is a tiny BC break, but it is just *those* that >> >> drive people nuts when upgrading. There is so much non-public code - a >> >> cursor check of Symfony and ZF is not representative. >> > >> > It is a tiny BC break and it’s for PHP NEXT (i.e 6 or 7), not 5.6. Why >> not? It’s a tiny change which will bother some people but make everyone >> else’s life easier. >> >> Voted +1, obviously for having that in php6, not 5.7. This tiny BC is >> then more than OK. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > Also +1. Major version increments always have BC breaks, and not just tiny > ones, either.
+1 as well. For a next major, every tip making things cleaner is welcome, and this is little BC. Julien -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
