On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > > On 8 Jul 2014, at 15:48, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > > > >> I've just voted "no" for this, because it introduces a tiny BC break. > >> Now, I realize this is a tiny BC break, but it is just *those* that > >> drive people nuts when upgrading. There is so much non-public code - a > >> cursor check of Symfony and ZF is not representative. > > > > It is a tiny BC break and it’s for PHP NEXT (i.e 6 or 7), not 5.6. Why > not? It’s a tiny change which will bother some people but make everyone > else’s life easier. > > Voted +1, obviously for having that in php6, not 5.7. This tiny BC is > then more than OK. > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > Also +1. Major version increments always have BC breaks, and not just tiny ones, either. --Kris
