On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > On 8 Jul 2014, at 15:48, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > >> I've just voted "no" for this, because it introduces a tiny BC break. >> Now, I realize this is a tiny BC break, but it is just *those* that >> drive people nuts when upgrading. There is so much non-public code - a >> cursor check of Symfony and ZF is not representative. > > It is a tiny BC break and it’s for PHP NEXT (i.e 6 or 7), not 5.6. Why not? > It’s a tiny change which will bother some people but make everyone else’s > life easier.
Voted +1, obviously for having that in php6, not 5.7. This tiny BC is then more than OK. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
