On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, this passed with 62.8%. Property accessors failed with 60.7%. The > target for acceptance is 66.6%. So 3.8% is enough to throw away, but 5.9% > isn't? > 94% voted to integrate ZO+. > Either we stick to the rules, or we throw them out and install a BDFL. > Either way, I don't care. I just think the current > they-sometimes-matter-depending-on-who-and-when-it-is-raised stance is > deeper than BS, it's dangerous and is actively turning away contributors > (as well as harming the project)... > Oh, please... Arpad
