On 2013-03-07, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote: > On 03/07/2013 09:01 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > >> So my proposal is to slow down for a minute and not call this RFC >> accepted or not until we can come to some consensus as to if it >> classifies as a language change or not... Better to clarify for the >> health of the project than to plow through and risk causing further >> strife... > > And how do you propose we do that? Vote on it? Will that vote need 2/3 > as well? I think most of us accepted that language-level changes meant > syntax changes. Things that add new features to the language itself.
I think the only thing requiring a 2/3 vote would be the decision on wheather to enable it by default or not. As long as it's in ext/ and not enabled a 50% should be sufficient. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
