On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote: > On 03/07/2013 08:26 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > >> That being said, if o+ would have 2/3 of the votes, I think it is >> possible to get it stable until 5.5 final, not easy but possible. > > We already covered that. An opcode cache doesn't affect the language > itself. There is no new syntax and no BC issues.
It affects the whole PHP environment, o+ becomes the de facto standard, it will replace APC or any other external projects per se in the long run. If such a move does not affect PHP then I do not know what else. > Much like a performance > improvement patch that has no effect on the language syntax doesn't need > 2/3. Whether it is "major" or not, doesn't matter per the established > voting process. You can't both be a stickler for the details of this > process and then ignore them when they become inconvenient for you. Oh indeed, I do that. Come on. But you'd to see that this RFC has been pushed badly in so many ways. That's not fine. And you also (or should) know that I am (or was) one of the 1st supporter to push into the core. We put our resources to test, fix and valid every single change in it since it was OSSed. However the way it is handled brings doubts, and I really don't want to have doubts for such a critical piece of the PHP environment. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
