On Mar 7, 2013, at 1:00 PM, David Soria Parra <d...@php.net> wrote: > On 2013-03-07, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote: >> On 03/07/2013 09:01 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote: >> >>> So my proposal is to slow down for a minute and not call this RFC >>> accepted or not until we can come to some consensus as to if it >>> classifies as a language change or not... Better to clarify for the >>> health of the project than to plow through and risk causing further >>> strife... >> >> And how do you propose we do that? Vote on it? Will that vote need 2/3 >> as well? I think most of us accepted that language-level changes meant >> syntax changes. Things that add new features to the language itself. > > I think the only thing requiring a 2/3 vote would be the decision on > wheather to enable it by default or not. As long as it's in ext/ > and not enabled a 50% should be sufficient.
Shouldn't we be focusing on how this makes PHP better? And not nitpick about a percentage point or two? This makes PHP better. Please, PHP, add it to 5.5. Regards, Philip -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
