Em Tue, 17 May 2011 17:49:53 +0100, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>
escreveu:
I think we need to keep token name in the message, since it makes it
easier to understand what parser expected if you need to debug the
parser (as opposed to your code). So I think we need to have both the
human-readable name and the token name, as Andi suggested.
I think this alternative has very little value for debugging the parser.
There are no repeated labels for the tokens, so even if you don't know the
token name by heart, you can look it up in 10 seconds.
Keeping the token name will only perpetuate the confusion it has caused. I
think it ought to be dropped, but if no consensus can be reached, this
would be better than the status quo.
--
Gustavo Lopes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
