Hi Pierre,
Excuse me but while the idea to have an online meeting was great, sending a mail to ask to attend an online meeting 24 hours before and on a Friday was not a wised choice. I would have participated too if it was during this week or the next weekend.
You were actually online throughout it, and were notified that it was happening at the start. In fact you were the first person to blog the outcome of the meeting.
I do agree with Sebastian about not allowing functions and constants (from a principle point of view, as I barely see any example out there of NS and procedural code).
Apart from PEAR?
I'd to say that I do not care about which symbol is used. @Greg and Steph: Private discussions are bad. Or are you trying to say that this list can't be used as a discussion platform (even heated)? If we like to have a developer only list, let do it, but keep things in the public area, that's the only way to keep our decision process transparent for everyone.
@Pierre: we didn't have a 'private discussion'. That this irc meeting was going to take place was noted on internals@ over a week ago following my 'consultation excercise', which incidentally practically all the core devs complained about due to the noise it generated. Only one internals dev requested to be notified of the details when the information was made public. Only one internals dev has complained that he wasn't invited, from which it would seem that the rest really didn't want to go through it all again, for one reason or another. It should also be noted that more were invited than actually attended, yourself included.
The need for a dev-only discussion will I think become apparent if you look at the detailed investigative reports Greg gave.
- Steph
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
