On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > >> Excuse me but while the idea to have an online meeting was great, >> sending a mail to ask to attend an online meeting 24 hours before and >> on a Friday was not a wised choice. I would have participated too if >> it was during this week or the next weekend. > > You were actually online throughout it, and were notified that it was > happening at the start. In fact you were the first person to blog the > outcome of the meeting.
"I'm" always online, bot/proxy. >> I do agree with Sebastian about not allowing functions and constants >> (from a principle point of view, as I barely see any example out there >> of NS and procedural code). > > Apart from PEAR? That's a new feature for a not released PHP version. The large part of the pear code base is OO anyway. > @Pierre: we didn't have a 'private discussion'. See my attempt to make this comment more clear. > The need for a dev-only discussion will I think become apparent if you look > at the detailed investigative reports Greg gave. I tend to think that there is phases, some are more heat, other are deadly quiet. Nothing that can really justify to create a larger wall between our users and us, even if we sometimes like to silent some of them :) Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
