Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 26.10.2008, at 19:07, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Greg Beaver wrote:
The decision is made, now I suggest everyone get busy actually trying
it out.
How are we supposed to try it out? There is no updated implementation
yet, and I would rather discuss a specification instead.
It was mentioned on IRC that internal functions have to be prefixed with
\ when used in a namespaced file. Without a fallback. This is insane.
We should either disallow functions and constants in namespaces which,
as far as I understand the issue, got us into the trouble, or remove the
feature completely.
Sebastian, you have not participated in the discussion so far. Now you
post a rumor you picked up on IRC into an already heated situation. You
do know full well that it does not require you to point out that this
would indeed be problematic (since people who are participating in this
discussion are actually aware of this). So do us all the favor and stop
and think a second before you post the next time.
So now the decisions are done in IRC..? Didn't we once agree that that does not
work since not everyone is there all the time?
And I must agree with Sebastian: How do you test something that isn't even
implemented yet? :D
NOTE: I do not give a damn about namespaces as long as they're optional. :)
For me prefixing has been enough for quite a long time and I don't see the need
for this syntax sugar. ;)
--Jani
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
