Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

[Scott Brim]

On 15 Dec 2000 at 10:56 -0500, Keith Moore apparently wrote:
> > How does the idea of NAT destroy the global Internet address space?
> 
> because in a NATted network the same addresses are used in different
> parts of the network.  addresses are meaningless.

How much meaning does "Keith Moore" have?  Somehow we have a planet with
billions of people on it and those who need to still manage to find the
appropriate "Keith Moore".  How do they do that?  Are there any lessons
to be learned?

...Scott