How does the idea of NAT destroy the global Internet address space? -----Original Message----- From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:05 AM To: M Dev Cc: Sean Doran; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NATs *ARE* evil! the problems with NAT are not generally due to implementation. they are inherent in the very idea of NAT, which destroys the global Internet address space. Keith
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! David W. Morris
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Masataka Ohta
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! M Dev
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Matt Holdrege
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Robinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Scott Brim
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! chris d koeberle
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Melinda Shore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Michael Richardson
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Robinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Valdis . Kletnieks