Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist]

> >     ipv6 is working just fine even here at IETF49 venue, it's so much more
> >     convenient than IPv4, for couple of reasons.
> 
> We can't use IPv6 until multihoming issues are properly solved
> and global routing table size and the number of ASes are
> controlled to be below reasonable upper bound.

If I am reading this right you want a upper bound for routing table size?
Well,considering the problems some operators have to aggreagate maybe that
would be a good idea...:) 

- kurtis -