Sean Doran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > % So, how many /20s are there in IPv6?
> > 
> > The same as IPv4.  Oh, you mean the number of prefixs that
> > carry the same number of end-node addresses as an IPv4 /20?
> > That would equate to the number of /116's in IPv6 parlance.
> 
> So how many /20s or how many /116s will fit into a routing table?

I think you are asking the wrong question.

Assuming we do agregation the way we do now, the difference v6 makes
is not that it lets you have more network numbers to put into the
global routing tables, but that it lets a provider give an end user
enough addresses for their whole home or business instead of just one
or a few.

Perry

Reply via email to