randy, just because routers meltdown from leaks and mis-configurations is not a reasonable justification for ARIN's tight policies on IPv4 allocations, which kim stated earlier was to keep space aggrigated for router memory requirements, adding speed and processing power to that definition still does not justify the strict policy decisions. -rick On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Randy Bush wrote: > it's not the memory. it's the processing power required which is quite > non-linear. > > it's not the memory for the /24s in old b space, it's the horrifying *large* > and *long* meltdowns caused by inadvertant leakage of bogus announcements of > /24s in old b space > > randy >
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Scott Bradner
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Kim Hubbard
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... Rick H Wesson
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Rick H Wesson
- Re: IP network address assignments... Kim Hubbard
- Re: IP network address assignments... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Francis Dupont