Ian King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Will this never end...? > > If you want to be able to control individual lightbulbs in your house, how > about an IP <-> X10 gateway? Insufficient. I want IP. There is no point in implementing anything less powerful than IP -- you only end up maintaining a second, inferior stack. IP does what you want already, and better. > NAT IS A HACK. Why is there so much effort going in to somehow either > "legitimizing" it, or demonizing it? Because there is a fight brewing about IPv6 and whether NAT is a sufficient alternative to IPv6. Perry
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Francis Dupont
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Robert Elz
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Ian King
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Ed Gerck
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Christian Huitema