Sean Doran wrote: ... > Are you of the belief that > as a matter of policy, everyone but "top level" providers will have > addresses from a "top level" provider, with no exceptions? > > Do you also beleive that for inter-TLA routing information-exchange > purposes, with respect to the destination address, ONLY the 13 (to > 21) TLA (+ RES) bits you mention should ever be considered by a > router in the core of the global network, except where two > directly-peering TLAs agree to exchange some NLA information? This is the plan. We start out with no holes in BGP and we try to keep it that way. Brian
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Ian King
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Ed Gerck
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Jessica Yu
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IP network address assignments... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignm... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IP network address assignm... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assignm... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignm... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assignm... Keith Moore