Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > what we are talking about is the survival of the Internet. > > you forgot the news at 11 part Actually, to a large extent, the "internet" as "transparent end to end catanet" *is* dead. It has been dead ever since the average company was forced to use private addressing. Maintaining the pseudo-internet we've got left is costing us a lot of money and manpower, and neither is an unlimited resource. It will make people very happy if we can give them an internet back again. -- Perry Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Jeffrey Altman
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Polinsky, Steven
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocation... Josh Duffek
- RE: IP network address assignments/alloca... Josh Duffek
- RE: IP network address assignments/alloca... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Keith Moore
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Ian King
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocation... Matt Holdrege
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address assignments/al... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Scott Bradner
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Robert Elz
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Kim Hubbard
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Rick H Wesson
- Re: IP network address assignments/al... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address assignment... Rick H Wesson
- Re: IP network address assig... Kim Hubbard