> Many of the people who have deployed NATs are responding directly to the > address scarcity (and resultant cost). If you consider that many ISPs now > have different pricing models for multiple IP addresses than they do for a > single (regardless of bandwidth used), it isn't surprising. no, not surprising (and in fact some people predicted it), but it is surely unfortunate. > I also think > that it's interesting to consider that security concerns are the other > primary reason for use of NAT. this is indeed used as a selling point for NATs, but it's just snake oil. the security benefits of NAT are dubious at best. Keith
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Perry E. Metzger
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Vernon Schryver
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Steve Hultquist
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Richard Shockey
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Steve Hultquist
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Tony Hain (Exchange)
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Pete Loshin
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Paul Ferguson
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Daniel Senie
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Matt Holdrege
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Ian King
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Keith Moore