Steve Hultquist wrote: ... > I also think > that it's interesting to consider that security concerns are the other > primary reason for use of NAT. As had been repeatedly pointed out, this is a totally bogus argument for NAT. Filtering routers were around long before NAT, and protect systems against intrusion just as well as NAT. Brian
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Brian E Carpenter
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Fleischman, Eric W
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Perry E. Metzger
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Vernon Schryver
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Steve Hultquist
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Richard Shockey
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Steve Hultquist
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Tony Hain (Exchange)
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Pete Loshin
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations i... Paul Ferguson
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Daniel Senie
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocatio... Matt Holdrege
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inform... Ian King