Mike - Erp... that’s where I’d pull back... I wouldn’t suggest it be added to the charter (that’s a pretty high bar)... rather, let’s chat off to the side about how to pull it in.
- Trent From: Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 5:19 PM To: Trent Adams <tad...@proofpoint.com>, Wei Chuang <wei...@google.com> Cc: ietf-dkim@ietf.org <ietf-dkim@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Re: Charter #4? On 1/29/25 4: 16 PM, Trent Adams wrote: From: Michael Thomas <mike@ mtcc. com> Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 5: 12 PM To: Wei Chuang <weihaw@ google. com> Cc: ietf-dkim@ ietf. org <ietf-dkim@ ietf. org> Subject: [Ietf-dkim] Re: On 1/29/25 4:16 PM, Trent Adams wrote: From: Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com><mailto:m...@mtcc.com> Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 5:12 PM To: Wei Chuang <wei...@google.com><mailto:wei...@google.com> Cc: ietf-dkim@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org> <ietf-dkim@ietf.org><mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org> Subject: [Ietf-dkim] Re: Charter #4? On 1/29/25 3: 54 PM, Wei Chuang wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3: 24 PM Michael Thomas <mike@ mtcc. com> wrote: On 1/28/25 7: 38 PM, Wei Chuang wrote: I would propose that the latest charter has latitude to try both the broad and narrow approaches ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart [snip] Maybe when all is said and done, we could write a BCP on what constitutes a DKIM-friendly MLM, and why it's in its interest to be well behaved. [/snip] Yes! This would be a fantastic addition! ... when the dust settles, I’d be keen to help support this work. Maybe we can add it to the charter as sort of aspirational thing where the wg gets to decide whether it wants to take it on? Murray? Mike
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org