Mike -

Erp... that’s where I’d pull back... I wouldn’t suggest it be added to the 
charter (that’s a pretty high bar)... rather, let’s chat off to the side about 
how to pull it in.

- Trent


From: Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 5:19 PM
To: Trent Adams <tad...@proofpoint.com>, Wei Chuang <wei...@google.com>
Cc: ietf-dkim@ietf.org <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Re: Charter #4?
On 1/29/25 4: 16 PM, Trent Adams wrote: From: Michael Thomas <mike@ mtcc. com> 
Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 5: 12 PM To: Wei Chuang <weihaw@ google. 
com> Cc: ietf-dkim@ ietf. org <ietf-dkim@ ietf. org> Subject: [Ietf-dkim] Re: 



On 1/29/25 4:16 PM, Trent Adams wrote:


From: Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com><mailto:m...@mtcc.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 5:12 PM
To: Wei Chuang <wei...@google.com><mailto:wei...@google.com>
Cc: ietf-dkim@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org> 
<ietf-dkim@ietf.org><mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ietf-dkim] Re: Charter #4?
On 1/29/25 3: 54 PM, Wei Chuang wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3: 24 PM Michael 
Thomas <mike@ mtcc. com> wrote: On 1/28/25 7: 38 PM, Wei Chuang wrote: I would 
propose that the latest charter has latitude to try both the broad and narrow 
approaches
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

[snip]

Maybe when all is said and done, we could write a BCP on what constitutes a 
DKIM-friendly MLM, and why it's in its interest to be well behaved.

[/snip]

Yes!  This would be a fantastic addition! ... when the dust settles, I’d be 
keen to help support this work.


Maybe we can add it to the charter as sort of aspirational thing where the wg 
gets to decide whether it wants to take it on? Murray?

Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to