On Sunday, October 6, 2019, 08:14:36 PM PDT, David Crayford
<dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2019-10-07 2:06 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
>> I'm saying that IBM can't fix this problem because the problem lies with
>> Unix shell design.
> IBM can and have fixed the problem! BPXBATCH is so bad they wrote a
> replacement AOPBATCH which works just as Kirk describes.
IBM does not consider BPXBATCH bad. AOPBATCH is not a replacement for BPXBATCH.
The AOP group wanted something different than BPXBATCH. I believe that BPXBATCH
was documented as running a Unix command but we stacked commands by using the
semicolon command separator.
AOPBATCH simply changes the problems. IBM doesn't need to address those
problems because they are outside the scope of AOP.
Jon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
