On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 14:52:32 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>You really like all of this mangling of the shell syntax?
>What about "here" documents (quoted or otherwise) ?
>The addition of STDPARM only makes it suck slightly less than before :-)
>
>For heaven's sake, why doesn't it just read the input from DD:STDIN and
>then send that to fd0 of the /bin/sh process?
>
BPXWUNIX can do that.
Too many incomplete solutions.
>That should be required for a passing grade. Extra credit if you can get
>it to run /bin/sh as a *login* shell in the same address space, but not
>much.
>
AOPBATCH. But IBM doesn't give it away.
Long ago, I posted my BPXWUNIX wrapper at:
http://vm.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?MVS-OE.26963
Some of the mangling I did there is now unnecessary with more
recent enhancements to BPXWUNIX.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
