On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:25:45 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:57:45 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>>IEBCOPY has been demoted from "APF Authorized" to
>>"Module residing in an authorized library, marked AC(0), so not designed to
>>be invoked authorized."  
>
>ITYM "Does not require authorization when executed as a job 
>step program."
>
>Because it is used by SMP/E, which is known to invoke it in an 
>authorized environment, it has to be designed to be invoked in 
>an authorized environment. ...
>
No.  SMP/E whitewashes that blot by now requiring special RACF
authorization of *any* programmer using SMP/E for any purpose
except LIST.  I'm dismayed.

> ... Furthermore, if it were not designed 
>to be invoked in an authorized environment, it should not be 
>included in an APF authorized load library.
> 
No.  Walt and Peter both said that when a program is in that condition
it becomes the caller's responsibility to perform whatever validation
is required for integrity.  SMP/E further sheds that burden by requiring
RACF authorization, presuming that the "trusted" programmer will
perform any additional required verification.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to