Legally "no" but it can be done .
Ed
On Mar 16, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I have a related question to this very informative thread. Inside a
long
running task, i.e.; stc can you turn off APF authorization and
turn back
on ? Btw I have customers asked about this.
Regards,
Scott
On Monday, March 16, 2015, Paul Gilmartin <
[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:49:26 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
at 12:53 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
is now impacted in that calling IEBCOPY causes his program to lose
authorization/ ABEND/whatever.
Not even close.
Read the thread. Walt already corrected me on that, and I
accepted the
correction.'
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:47:52 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Also, what benefit comes from changing IEBCOPY from AC(1) to AC(0)?
The obvious one: it will work when invoked by an unauthorized
program.
I don't think so; if I were to relink IEBCOPY with AC(1) into an
authorized
library, it would work equally well when called from an unauthorized
program.
-- gil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] <javascript:;> with the
message:
INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
