On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:04:12 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >Don't *think* so. My (so to speak) program still works just fine. > Of course. Your program was marked AC(1) *solely* because it needed to invoke IEBCOPY(O) in authorized state. Now it invokes IEBCOPY marked AC(0); loses authorization (which now doesn't matter); and still works fine. >Charles > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Gilmartin >Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:53 AM > >On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:37:46 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: > >>I am responsible for a vendor program that installs APF-authorized *solely* >>because it needs to call IEBCOPY. > >OTOH, a vendor with a program which: >o Uses IEBCOPY >o Must be AC(1) for reasons not related to IEBCOPY > >... is now impacted in that calling IEBCOPY causes his program to lose >authorization/ ABEND/whatever. > (But that's not you; never was.)
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
