Last time I did stuff like this was DMKRIO or a TCAM gen.
These are my definitions (a lot of guesswork):
Switch ID . . . . . . . . . : 04
Switch type . . . . . . . . . 9033 +
Switch address . . . . . . . .
Switch address not allowed for switch 04 of type 9033.
Switch ID . . . . . . . . . : 05
Switch type . . . . . . . . . 9033 +
Control unit number . . . . 0004 +
Control unit type . . . . . 2107-IBM
Connected to switches . . . 04 04 __
Ports . . . . . . . . . . . C0 C1 __
Control unit number . . . . 0005 +
Control unit type . . . . . 2107-IBM
Connected to switches . . . 05 05 __
Ports . . . . . . . . . . . C2 C3 __
Control unit number : 0004 Control unit type . : 2107-IBM
----------Device------ --#--- --------Control Unit Numbers + --------
/ Number Type + CSS OS 1--- 2--- 3--- 4--- 5--- 6--- 7--- 8---
_ 4B00,16 3380-CJ2 1 0005 0004 ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
The graphic display shows all connected.
What did I screw up?
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:30:00 -0500 Paul Feller
<[email protected]> wrote:
:>Well, you need to define the switches plus the DASD. You must define the
:>switch device/control unit the DASD will connect to. I don't recall the
:>switch type you would use. I haven't done an IODF with switches in a while.
:>Bottom line the DASD has its control unit, devices and channel interfaces
:>plus you have to have a separate definition for the switch which has its
:>control unit and ports.
:>
:>CBDG061I Switch control unit must be defined for switch switch_id.
:>
:>Explanation
:>A switch control unit must be defined for the indicated switch. The switch
:>control unit is used to communicate with the switch and must have a special
:>control unit type.
:>
:>System action
:>System waits for user action.
:>
:>User response
:>Specify the switch control unit and connect it to the switch control unit
:>port.
:>
:>Programmer response
:>None.
:>
:>
:>
:>Paul
:>
:>-----Original Message-----
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
:>Radoslaw Skorupka
:>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 3:17 PM
:>To: [email protected]
:>Subject: Re: Try to define a DS8* to a zPDT IODF
:>
:>IMHO your problem is unrelated to zPDT, it is just a erroneous definition.
:>Reason:
:>When you work with HCD you define something which may or may not be close
:>to your physical setup.
:>Just imagine you have four z16 machines and dozen of D8K dasd boxes. And
:>huge FICON directors.
:>You can work with such definitions, however it cannot be activated without
:>the equipment.
:>But in your case the HCD warns you the definitions are simply wrong. It
:>doesn't matter whether your hardware is real or emulated.
--
Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
