Classification: Confidential

I don't feel this is the fault of Windows; This is the fault of power-hungry 
net-nannies who want to control everything (all in the name of protecting the 
enterprise).

One size fits all, and everyone is too stupid to recognize a phishing email 
when they see it.

A pox on their houses!

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Joe 
Monk
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 6:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: World’s largest computer outage!

[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the 
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, 
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]

More to the point, the issue is not Windows, but the abuse of Windows.
Example: requiring administrator rights to do ordinary, everyday tasks.

This led to "script kiddies" which caused us to be defensive on PCs, e.g.
Anti-Malware.

Joe

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 6:31 PM Steve Beaver < 
0000050e0c375a14-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> We never had these problems until Windows showed up
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> No one said I could type with one thumb
>
> > On Jul 19, 2024, at 18:22, Paul Edwards <
> 00000676ab6435a5-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:46:40 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike
> > <wayn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Some kind of false economy to make the PC the entire tool of choice
> >> for certain routine tasks.
> >>
> >> In the 1980s we had proprietary banking terminals, private/leased
> >> line point to point communications and passbooks.
> >
> > This is a topic of interest to me. I still program in C90 too.
> > Still restrict myself to S/370 instructions too (quibbling aside).
> >
> > However - for what reason would a proprietary banking terminal be
> > more reliable than a PC? Isn't it more the automatic update feature
> > of the PC that is the issue? That won't protect against a
> > date-related bug in some component though.
> >
> > So perhaps 2 different PC solutions (e.g. the Amiga) - if we're
> > talking 1980s.
> >
> >> No way our branch network would be unable to perform front counter
> >> transactions. We had store and forward whereby local transactions
> >> would
> be
> >> kept until the network was back up and running.
> >>
> >> In those days we had 3 ATMs, preferring to let other banks provide
> >> that service and we would absorb the fees.
> >>
> >> I drew out $620 in cash from an ATM yesterday, just a few hours
> >> before
> the
> >> crash. Too many people are embracing the cashless world. Time to
> >> wake up and apply some common sense.
> >
> > Are you suggesting using physical cash because software and hardware
> > engineers are unable to create a reliable alternative?
> >
> > The cost of handling physical cash is likely hidden in taxes or
> > whatever. If it was properly costed, maybe IBM mainframes would be
> > part of the solution, and Amigas too?
> >
> > Note that I created PDOS because I didn't want to be dependent on
> > millions of lines of code that I didn't understand and/or didn't
> > have access to. Simplicity. For simple tasks. My wife didn't have
> > access to her bank account for about 6 months because she either
> > wasn't receiving SMSes at all (from this one bank), or they would
> > arrive too
> late.
> >
> > No-one was able to do anything other than say "try again later".
> >
> > 6 digits could have been sent with a Commodore 64 and a 300 bps
> > modem to any spot on earth within 0.2 seconds in the 1980s.
> >
> > That was in 2023, but even in 2024 SMSes still get lost - and other
> > situations too - I think Discord lost a message of mine in 2024.
> > I don't remember a zmodem file transfer ever losing a file of mine.
> >
> > BFN. Paul.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
> > IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
::DISCLAIMER::
________________________________
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. 
The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore 
not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or 
opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and 
may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any 
form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for 
viruses and other defects.
________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to