If it's RMF you have the re-assembly area. If it's SMF 30 you have a similar mechanism. But this isn't architected by SMF. And you're right the granularity is 1/100th of a second.
Martin Packer WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): https://anchor.fm/marna-walle Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA From: "Pierre Fichaud" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 16/09/2021 13:44 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RMF SMF "broken" records Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> Martin, Hence my original post. I have 3 "broken" records. I use the type,subtype, date and time in the SMF header to create a unique value relating the 3 records. But the time is only in 100ths of seconds. I don't think it's granular enough. Is there something extra I can use to make a unique key? Regards, Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
