On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not > sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct? Thanks, Cos > hth, > Arun > > On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun > > was > > cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example. > > > > Thanks for your input and help Alejandro! > > > > Regards, > > Cos > > > > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > >> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be > >> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we > >> are not cutting a new rc for other reason > >> > >> +1 on rc1 > >> > >> Thx > >> > >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Alejandro, > >>> > >>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into > >>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same > >>> situation: > >>> > >>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED > >>> > >>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think > >>> this > >>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Cos > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > >>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a > >>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS. > >>>> > >>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have > >>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date > >>>> the vote ends). > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis > >>>> <jrottingh...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos. > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/ > >>>>> looks good to me. > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Joep > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in > >>>>>> branch-2.0.4-alpha > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> later. It has been committed as > >>>>>> r1465124 > >>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit > >>>>>> message: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have > >>>>> noted > >>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cos > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >>>>>>> Alejandro, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha > >>>>>>> section > >>>>>> in > >>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get > >>>>>> into > >>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember > >>>>> doing > >>>>>> this. > >>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. > >>>>>> Also, I > >>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for > >>>>> the > >>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I > >>>>>>> wasn't > >>>>>> aware > >>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing > >>>>>> source > >>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback! > >>>>>>> Cos > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > >>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a > >>>>>> couple of > >>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured > >>>>> timeout > >>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it > >>>>>> should > >>>>>>>> be there empty). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> All, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha > >>>>> that > >>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>> like to release. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The RC is available at: > >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/ > >>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on > >>>>>> Sat, > >>>>>>>>> June > >>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here > >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 > >>>>>> days, > >>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical > >>>>>> to the > >>>>>>>>> ones > >>>>>>>>> voted on before in > >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting > >>>>>>>>> Cos > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Alejandro > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Alejandro > > -- > Arun C. Murthy > Hortonworks Inc. > http://hortonworks.com/ > >
