Alejandro, I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same situation:
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem. Thanks, Cos On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a > couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS. > > CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have > 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date > the vote ends). > > Thanks > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jrottingh...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Thanks for fixing Cos. > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/ > > looks good to me. > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joep > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha > > > and > > > later. It has been committed as > > > r1465124 > > > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message: > > > > > > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk > > > > > > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have > > noted > > > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few. > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > Alejandro, > > > > > > > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section > > > in > > > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get > > > into > > > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember > > doing > > > this. > > > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. > > > Also, I > > > > will do JIRA in a moment. > > > > > > > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for > > the > > > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't > > > aware > > > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing > > > source > > > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin. > > > > > > > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback! > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > > > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a > > > couple of > > > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS. > > > > > > > > > > Still, something seems odd. > > > > > > > > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha: > > > > > > > > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured > > timeout > > > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos) > > > > > > > > > > but I don't see that in the branch. > > > > > > > > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it > > > should > > > > > be there empty). > > > > > > > > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha > > that > > > I > > > > > > would > > > > > > like to release. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a > > of > > > > > > issues > > > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate. > > > > > > > > > > > > The RC is available at: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/ > > > > > > The RC tag in svn is here: > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0 > > > > > > > > > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on > > > Sat, > > > > > > June > > > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD > > > > > > > > > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 > > > days, > > > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical > > > to the > > > > > > ones > > > > > > voted on before in > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your voting > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Alejandro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Alejandro
