This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example. 

Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!

Regards,
  Cos

On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
> 
> +1 on rc1
> 
> Thx
> 
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > Alejandro,
> > 
> > I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> > unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> > situation:
> > 
> > Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> > 
> > But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think 
> > this
> > is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> > 
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >> 
> >> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >> the vote ends).
> >> 
> >> Thanks
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis 
> >> <jrottingh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>> looks good to me.
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> 
> >>> Joep
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>> and
> >>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>>  r1465124
> >>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>> 
> >>>>        svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>> 
> >>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>> noted
> >>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cos
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>> in
> >>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>> into
> >>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>> doing
> >>>> this.
> >>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>> Also, I
> >>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>> the
> >>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>> aware
> >>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>> source
> >>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>>  Cos
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>> couple of
> >>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>> timeout
> >>>>>> value  (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>> should
> >>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>> that
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>>    http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>> days,
> >>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>> to the
> >>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>>    http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>>  Cos
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Alejandro

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to