I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we are not cutting a new rc for other reason
+1 on rc1 Thx On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > Alejandro, > > I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into > unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same > situation: > > Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED > > But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this > is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem. > > Thanks, > Cos > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: >> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a >> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS. >> >> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have >> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date >> the vote ends). >> >> Thanks >> >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis >> <jrottingh...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Thanks for fixing Cos. >>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/ >>> looks good to me. >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Joep >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha >>>> and >>>> later. It has been committed as >>>> r1465124 >>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message: >>>> >>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk >>>> >>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have >>> noted >>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few. >>>> >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>> Alejandro, >>>>> >>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section >>>> in >>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get >>>> into >>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember >>> doing >>>> this. >>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. >>>> Also, I >>>>> will do JIRA in a moment. >>>>> >>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for >>> the >>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't >>>> aware >>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing >>>> source >>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin. >>>>> >>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback! >>>>> Cos >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: >>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a >>>> couple of >>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS. >>>>>> >>>>>> Still, something seems odd. >>>>>> >>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha: >>>>>> >>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured >>> timeout >>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos) >>>>>> >>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it >>>> should >>>>>> be there empty). >>>>>> >>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha >>> that >>>> I >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> like to release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a >>> of >>>>>>> issues >>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The RC is available at: >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/ >>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here: >>>>>>> >>>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on >>>> Sat, >>>>>>> June >>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 >>>> days, >>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical >>>> to the >>>>>>> ones >>>>>>> voted on before in >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your voting >>>>>>> Cos >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alejandro >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alejandro
