> > I am really sorry > to hear about so ridiculous comments about xMate. I would suggest you > just to give it a try before repeatedly shouting against it. >
xMate was my first try when I come back to xBase programming. I will never use it or nothing with same behavior. Maybe my comments are ridiculous, maybe yours. I still thinking (not guessing) xMate is a non standard IDE with non complete code editor. I used a lot of code editors and IDEs. You refused try them at least to get inspired and see by your own eyes what is a standard behavior. > > What is the standard in selections and cut/copy/paste ? MS Word ? > Or any other editor ? The standard is/was already there in Qt and > correspondingly > I am talking about IDE. Sorry if want talk about editor of letters or an niche project manager with a sub optimal code editor. And I am sorry you want insistently close your eyes to professional IDEs available in the market. I am not talking about a specific issue, but in general. I am seeing a lot of good improvements on software. What I am not seeing is you open your eyes to standard behavior adopted from established IDEs. When it happens, the quality is go high fast because you are able to make good things very fast when you want. Again, you are free to do how you want, but Harbour community will have no professional IDE to work. Mindaugas, Viktor and I are not alone about this. Certainly nobody can impose anything to you except the individual relegation of final product. I reinforce: I want use HbIDE, it's very important to me, but I will only if it fits my needs and workflow. Am I alone? And I want contribute to HbIDE when it is adequate to me and I hope when HbIDE have proper behavior. Thus for now I hope can contribute with suggestions to improve the most important tool to Harbour platform itself. []'s Maniero
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
