> > The idea of start from analyse harbour source code is rightcan be a > hbdoc2 project? >
I've yet to see a usable *user documentation* automatically written by software which analysed source code ;) Anyway, everyone is free to try any sort of approach he likes. As for hbdoc2, I think the tool is not the most important thing here. Probably if someone has enough drive to write it, he/she will know what tool is the best for him/her. Once the doc is written (meaning there exist some actual content), we can convert it (one time) to our preferred *standard* source format. We can discuss these things till the end of time, until there is anybody willing to actually create the documentation, it's just empty lamentation. IMO someone should get in contact with Mr. Hans Ziegler and/or the MiniGUI team (the Extended one, which is called HMG as far as I can tell). Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
