Hello again, <<< Names are also used quite inconsistently right now, some are named WVG and some WVT, so I think we should somehow transition things to WVG. To not break app compatibility, a simple #define layer could be added to translate WVT to WVG for the application level code, optionally with a notice that code is recommended to be updated. >>>
It is not so simple to exploit translates. All my applications are highly end-user configurable and a lot of code is centered around macros distributed in local as well as application defined data-dictionaries. Hope it is sufficient to put my argument. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/2008-06-26-11%3A21-UTC%2B0200-Viktor-Szakats-%28harbour.01-syenar-hu%29-tp18129952p18147002.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
