Hello

<<<
I'm seeing lots of "WVT"s in filenames (sources, headers),
>>>

I am fine with changes in filenames.

<<<
function names, 
>>>

Absolutely NO, as it is the central idea behind.

<<<
other strings. 
>>>

I am fine with these changes, again.

<<<
They might be similar, but
they are not at all the same, so they should have distinct
names. Sometime I even don't know which we are talking about
on this list, it's that confusing. All GTs are replaceable,
that's their main point, but if they are different, they
should be named differently.
>>>

Sure all GT's are replaceable but the exception is GTWVT and GTWVG.
Both are mutually exclusive.

Regards
Pritpal Bedi
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/2008-06-26-11%3A21-UTC%2B0200-Viktor-Szakats-%28harbour.01-syenar-hu%29-tp18129952p18146183.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to