Hello <<< I'm seeing lots of "WVT"s in filenames (sources, headers), >>>
I am fine with changes in filenames. <<< function names, >>> Absolutely NO, as it is the central idea behind. <<< other strings. >>> I am fine with these changes, again. <<< They might be similar, but they are not at all the same, so they should have distinct names. Sometime I even don't know which we are talking about on this list, it's that confusing. All GTs are replaceable, that's their main point, but if they are different, they should be named differently. >>> Sure all GT's are replaceable but the exception is GTWVT and GTWVG. Both are mutually exclusive. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/2008-06-26-11%3A21-UTC%2B0200-Viktor-Szakats-%28harbour.01-syenar-hu%29-tp18129952p18146183.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour