Hello Viktor <<< ; TODO: I'd suggest to change "WVT" references to "WVG" to avoid confusion with core WVT. At least in those places which wouldn't break compatibility (like source names). If there is no objection I can do it.What exactly you mean by WVT references? But I will not suggest any changes to this methodology as both libraries are essentially the same in all respects and an applicatioon can be linked with both of them without any code change. Also it will make it easy to keep synchronized both if we add more features to one. But perhaps I may be misunderstanding your concept.
Hi Pritpal, I'm seeing lots of "WVT"s in filenames (sources, headers), function names, other strings. They might be similar, but they are not at all the same, so they should have distinct names. Sometime I even don't know which we are talking about on this list, it's that confusing. All GTs are replaceable, that's their main point, but if they are different, they should be named differently. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
