On Tuesday 24 June 2008 03:05:44 am Szakáts Viktor wrote: > (when will 1.0.0 be considered closes, how will we > release 1.0.1, how to copy/mark stuff on SVN..., > shall we rename 1.0.0RC1 to 1.0?)
There may be multiple branches, but they need to be clearly defined on what can be done to them. Likely, something like your diagram, though. For now, it's a problem we can tackle in the future. When we mark 1.0.0-Final, we will also branch it to 1.1.0-dev where ongoing work will be done. Any branches to 1.0.0-Final will be for service packs, like 1.0.0-SP1, which should retain nearly 100% 1.0.0 compatibility and smash any big bugs. If there are no big bugs, there should be no SP1. The old branches need to be left alone. There is no point in updating them. If you want to work on multiple fronts, those branches should be made from the most current branch you wish to base your branch on. Not something in the past that needs to be caught up. That method is a waste of time and breaks things. For now, I have asked developers to put enhancements on hold and concentrate on getting a stable 1.0.0 to the world. Then, we can go crazy. -- Waiting for sunspots. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
