On Monday 23 June 2008 04:31:12 am Szakáts Viktor wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any opinions on whether to use > RC1 or the main branch as the source for RC2? > > I'd more and more vote to the main branch > as the source, as there has been too many > changes and fixes to be easy to merge.
Well, in the SVN world, there is no distinction between a tag and a branch. Once a branch is set, there is no reason to keep working on the old branch. If you continue working on it, then there is no way to go back to it's original state at the branch point. We should be working in RC1 branch, and when it is tagged for RC2, all work should be done there. The branch that we left behind when we tagged RC1 was not a main branch, it was just a branch with a name, like all the others. It was called 0.0.99r??, but it was no more or less important than any other branch. Don't spend a lot of time keeping other branches up to date. We should be working exclusively in 1.0.0 RC1. -- Waiting for sunspots. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
