Cayetano Santos writes:

Hi Guix!

>   I did a quick count of replies (please, correct me if I’m wrong):
>
>     - 45 support (codeberg + email)
>     - 5 accept (email)
>     - 1 disapprove (email)

Thanks for counting!  After close and thoughtful inspection, I have
reached a different conclusion.  As a sponsor of this GCD 008 I feel
called upon to propose this correction:

     - 45 support (codeberg + email)
     - 5 accept (email)
     - 0 valid disapproves
     - 1 invalid*) disapprove (email)

     *) Reason for invalidation: no constructive comments were made
        by this team member.

Let me elaborate.  The GCD 001 states (EMPHASIS mine):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Once the final version is published, team members have 14 days to send one
of the following replies on the patch-tracking entry of the GCD:

[..]
- “I disapprove”, meaning that one opposes the implementation of the
  proposal.  A team member sending this reply SHOULD HAVE MADE CONSTRUCTIVE
  COMMENTs during the discussion period.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

For the (single!) disapprove vote to be deemed valid, that team member
should have made constructive commentS.  Note the plural.  I found none.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.  I did find (a couple of) requests to
provide usable input.  Those were left unanswered.

To put this in perspective: Many, many, in fact an unprecedented
(overwhelming?) amount of constructive, thoughtful comments were made
and patches were provided by team members who (initially) strongly
opposed this GCD, seeking and actually working towards, consensus.

>   Therefore, applying GCD 001:
>
>         The GCD is *accepted* if (1) at least 25% of all team members–as of 
> the
>         start of the “Deliberation Period”–send a reply, and (2) no one
>         disapproves.  In other cases, the GCD is *withdrawn*.
>
>   So GCD 008 is withdrawn.

Therefore, I propose that---unless someone proves me wrong---GCD 008's
status be corrected to "accepted".

Greetings,
Janneke

-- 
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>  | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com

Reply via email to