Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 09:18 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin: > > As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here. We > > could try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have > > their cup of tea, but maintaining one's own Emacs on the > > user/channel level ought not to be too difficult either. > > I guess inheriting pgtk from tree-sitter looks most logical here: no > potential problems for X users, tree-sitter for wayland users. > Updated the inheritance hierarchy. For the future, I think we should be careful not to be too close to the master branch. emacs-next has thus far historically been a package to try out things for the next release, not the one after that. The inclusion of a package variant with tree-sitter necessitated a change, but for packages that don't need it we should go back to tailing pre- releases as soon as reasonable.
Cheers
