On 2023-03-10 20:36, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 10.03.2023 um 22:44 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin: >> > > Thanks for pointing that. From my understanding, it does not >> > > change what Cayetanos is raising: emacs-next-tree-sitter is built >> > > using '--with-pgtk'. In fact, the package emacs-next-tree-sitter >> > > is built using the master branch (Emacs 30 unbranched yet) with >> > > tree-sitter *and* pgtk support. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > simon >> > >> > As for the NEWS-29 file: >> > >> > "Running this configuration on X is known to have problems, such as >> > undesirable frame positioning and various issues with keyboard >> > input of sequences such as 'C-;' and 'C-S-u'." >> > >> > C. >> >> I haven't used X for a while, but if it's still the case for 30 >> version, I guess we can inherit pgtk from tree-sitter. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the point of C-S-u with pure GTK to > use GNOME's ibus widget? Granted, we have other problems with ibus > currently, but it's still a part that makes the pgtk branch feel > gnomier. >
I'm not very into the details of implementation of pgtk and how it affects C-S-u, also, I don't usually use C-S-u, so can't say much here. > As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here. We could > try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have their cup of > tea, but maintaining one's own Emacs on the user/channel level ought > not to be too difficult either. I guess inheriting pgtk from tree-sitter looks most logical here: no potential problems for X users, tree-sitter for wayland users. Updated the inheritance hierarchy. -- Best regards, Andrew Tropin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
