>ven. 10 mars 2023 at 13:07, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that emacs-next-tree-sitter is not from the 29 branch (emacs-next) > but from the 30 branch. Therefore, it would mean emacs-next-pgtk also > be an Emacs 30 version. I do not use them so I have not opinion. > > And why not split the chain, i.e., having: > > (define-public emacs-next-pgtk > (package > (inherit emacs-next) > > and > > (define-public emacs-next-tree-sitter > (package > (inherit emacs-next) > > ? Fine with me, even if to me emacs-next means latest from master, including tree-sitter. You decide to use the feature, or not. Gtk is something else, as it imposes a strong limitation on the use of emacs (wayland). C.
