On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 10:29:12PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > > Is there other reasonably widely used software with this name? Our package > > guidelines say to use the upstream name. > > Here is what I found: > > https://github.com/kristapsdz/acme-client > The program I have proposed to package. > > https://github.com/unixcharles/acme-client > Written in Ruby. Appears active. > > https://github.com/kelunik/acme-client > Written in PHP. Appears active. > > https://github.com/zero11it/acme-client > Written in Java. No recent activity and only 8 commits to the Git repo.
Maybe one solution would be to call the first program "acme-client", and, if it ever gets packaged, the second one "ruby-acme-client" and so on? Andreas
